Expert Attorneys + Agentic AICollaborate on Complex Litigation
DocketIQ is an AI-powered litigation intelligence platform
that brings your cases, evidence, documents, witnesses, deadlines, research, and strategy together in one intelligent workspace—helping legal teams see connections, uncover gaps, and build stronger cases.
The Software Should Not Decide Anything.It Organizes. You Decide.
DocketIQ organizes what is alleged, what is in the file, who knows what, and what is missing. It does not tell you whether you win. No screen in the application marks an element proven, and there is no such state in the database to mark it with.
DocketIQ organizes
- What is alleged
- What is in the file
- Who knows what
- What is missing
The attorney decides
- Whether an element is proven
- What the evidence means
- What gets filed
- Whether you win
An Allegation Is Not Evidence.Different Kinds of Thing Live Apart.
Pleading text, documents, witness statements, attorney assertions and AI output are different kinds of thing, and a system that stores them the same way will eventually let someone confuse them. In DocketIQ they live apart, and nothing collapses one into another.
“Halvorsen suppressed the security alert from the same session.”
Complaint ¶ 26 · an allegation
“Alert suppressed by account “security-alerts”.”
Access log · MERIDIAN-000029 · evidence
Kept as separate kinds of record:
- Pleading text
- Documents
- Witness statements
- Attorney assertions
- AI output
Missing Is a Finding.The Dangerous Part of a Case Is What You Don’t Have.
Most litigation software is built to show you what you have. The dangerous part of a case is what you do not have and have not noticed. Gaps are first-class records here, each with the step that would close it.
- 96 propositions supported
- 22 partly supported
- 12 evidence needed
- 10 awaiting discovery
AI Assists; It Does Not Conclude.Every Answer Shows Where It Came From.
Every model output cites its source, is checked in code before anyone sees it, and enters the record only when a person accepts it. An assistant that cannot show you where an answer came from is not useful to a lawyer, whatever else it is.
- ✓
Model answers
From the record
- ✓
Cites its source
Document and page
- ✓
Checked in code
Before anyone sees it
- ✓
A person accepts
Or rejects it
- ✓
Enters the record
Only once accepted
Collaboration Should Not Cost Confidentiality.Each Person Reaches Only What Is Theirs.
A client has knowledge the firm needs. A witness has an account only they can give. Neither should require handing them the case file—so the portals exist, and a witness account holds exactly one capability.
- WitnessTheir own statement, and nothing elseOne capability
- ClientThe case, drafts in client review, shared researchReads and comments
- ParalegalPrepares the work for counselNo privilege calls
- AttorneyPrivilege, designations, approvalsProfessional judgment
The Record Has to Survive Being Challenged.Nothing Disappears Without a Trace.
Originals are immutable and hashed on arrival. Deletions leave a permanent tombstone. Every drafting conversation behind a witness statement is kept, because how a statement came to be worded is the first thing asked if it is challenged.
One document’s life in the record
- 1
Uploaded
Original kept
Day 1
- 2
Fingerprinted
Hash recorded
On arrival
- 3
Reviewed
Every change logged
Ongoing
- 4
Produced
Bates stamped
Discovery
- 5
Deleted?
Tombstone remains
Forever
The Rest of the StoryIs Worth a Conversation.
We would rather show you the workspace than write another page about ourselves.